Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Ç¥¸é °¡°ø¿¡ µû¸¥ »óº¯ÀÌ

Phase transition of Zirconia by surface treatments

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 32±Ç 2È£ p.57 ~ 63
ÀÌÁ¤¼ö, ½ÉÁ¤¼®, Á¤ÇüÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁ¤¼ö ( Lee Jung-Soo ) - TEMÄ¡°ú±â°ø¼Ò
½ÉÁ¤¼® ( Shim Jeong-Seok ) - °æÈñÀÇ·á¿ø Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡°ú±â°ø½Ç
Á¤ÇüÈ£ ( Jung Hyung-Ho ) - (ÁÖ)¿¡Å¥¼¼¶óºÎ¼³¿¬±¸¼Ò

Abstract


Purpose : This study aimed to find out the effects of treatments on the surface of Zirconia.

Methods : To this end, we selected six treatments that have been used widely: steam cleaning, 2bar & 6bar sand blasting, grinding by green stone point, grinding by diamond bur, and grinding by diamond bur with water spray.

Results : The results of our study showed that monoclinic rate increased from all six treatments. Monoclinic rate varied by treatments, ranged from 0.6% (steam cleaning) to 6.5% (6bar sand blasting). These values from all six treatments were below ISO 13356 standard, which is 25%. Also, we found that two treatments (green stone point and diamond bur) increased roughness of surface of Zirconia.

Conclusion : This study concluded that phase changes of Zirconia were not significant by using six treatments we employed.

Å°¿öµå

Grinding; Sand Blasting; Steam Cleaning; Surface treatment; Zirconia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI